Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Soft drinks can be as addictive as cigarettes
orlando sentinel | April 7, 2002 | Mike Thomas

Posted on 04/12/2002 5:02:05 AM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant

Soft drinks can be as addictive as cigarettes

Published April 7, 2002

When those of us who eat our bran and exercise for 45 minutes a day are done purging cigarettes from society, we will need a new moral crusade to embark upon.

After perusing a list of potential villains, the new target is obvious -- carbonated sucrose water. Or as they call it in the Midwest: pop.

No longer can we ignore the increasing carnage to society caused by soft drinks.

Cigarettes kill 400,000 people a year, but close behind is obesity with more than 300,000 victims. The main cause of obesity is sugar. The main source of sugar is pop.

Soft drinks are nothing more than a delivery vehicle for sugar. Each American consumes an average of 115 pounds of sugar per year. Sugar is an addictive drug and should be regulated by the FDA.

Health officials say 61 percent of adults are overweight or obese. Even more alarming, 13 percent of children between the ages of 6 and 11 are fat, triple the percent from 20 years ago.

If you look at this statistically, everybody in America will be waddling in a few decades.

Soft drinks provide 9 percent of all calories consumed by boys ages 12 to 19. The more overweight a child, the higher percent of calories he or she gets from soft drinks.

Twenty years ago, kids drank twice as much milk as soda. Now the ratio is reversed.

We are headed for a health-care crisis that will dwarf anything caused by cigarettes. Obesity costs the United States about $117 billion a year. That number will skyrocket as the current generation of obese adults enters the disease phase of their condition.

Expensive medical advances will keep them alive much longer than nature intended, gobbling up huge chunks of our gross national product.

Soft drinks are destroying the American economy.

Coke once came in 6½-ounce bottles. Now teenagers knock back two quarts in one giant Double-Gulp.

Is it any wonder there is an epidemic of adult-onset diabetes in children?

The marketing of cigarettes and soft drinks is remarkably similar. Each relentlessly pursues the youth market to build brand loyalty.

Just check out the Mountain Dew ads. They portray kids who are cool and rebellious, thin and athletic.

They are little Marlboro Men with a yo dude twist.

Meanwhile, soft-drink makers pay off elected officials to put their dispensing machines in our schools.

Remember when cigarette makers refused to admit the danger of their product? Soft-drink makers actually claim that caffeine-laced sugar water has a place in a child's nutritious diet. They blame the epidemic of obesity on a lack of exercise, without acknowledging their own guilt.

Exercise is a problem. But we will deal with that later, in the mandatory aerobics phase of our movement.

So what should we do?

Take soft drinks off the store shelves and out of schools. Stop marketing to kids. Start a Truth-style advertising campaign.

States should file class action lawsuits against soft-drink makers to recover Medicaid money spent treating obesity-related diseases.

Put a sin tax on soda, an idea that already is being floated.

You think I'm crazy? The soft-drink makers don't. Read the industry newsletters. They know their day is coming.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: pufflist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
will my sugar free diet coke be tax exempt
1 posted on 04/12/2002 5:02:05 AM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
put real sugar back in coke. corn sweetener is the problem.
2 posted on 04/12/2002 5:07:38 AM PDT by Rustynailww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
It's the carbohydrates that are addictive. To single out soft drinks would be unfair, since they are ignoring many other vehicles that deliver carbohydrates to the body - like candy, snack cakes, ice cream, and many other foods.

I suppose diet drinks/foods would be exempt.

3 posted on 04/12/2002 5:08:01 AM PDT by peteram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
This writer must be related to the Democratic legislator in California who's just gotten her soda tax passed by the health committee (she's also proposed a very steep cigarette and cigar tax too) so that the proceeds can have a class to teach kids not to drink sodas and get fat. Funny thing is she's also overweight and says she doesn't drink sugared sodas. Wonder what she obviously DOES (over-)eat that she'll want to tax in the future.
4 posted on 04/12/2002 5:11:09 AM PDT by Moonmad27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
Dr. Pepper is a drug.
5 posted on 04/12/2002 5:12:01 AM PDT by Tickle Me Pank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
Did you notice the spin on the cost of tobacco to the nation, new est. $7 a pack. Looks like the new plan is to sin tax us to death.

If we allow these bastards to put a dollar tax on a soda pop, or another 2 or 3 a pack on smokes, we are the most spineless people in the history of the planet.

6 posted on 04/12/2002 5:15:10 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
I have been in the soft drink industry for over twenty years.

This is nothing but propaganda from the "we are all victims" crowd of the brain dead.

They are so many half truths in this article, I can't even begin.

Sugar is an addictive drug

Yeah, right.

7 posted on 04/12/2002 5:19:10 AM PDT by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonmad27
my take was the writer was being sarcastic because there really is a proposal to tax soda nationwide
8 posted on 04/12/2002 5:25:27 AM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JZoback
I do believe you missed the satire implied in this column.
9 posted on 04/12/2002 5:27:06 AM PDT by bleudevil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
Put a sin tax on soda, an idea that already is being floated.

Put a "KICK ME, I'M A LIBERAL" sign on the author's back.

10 posted on 04/12/2002 5:35:46 AM PDT by Caipirabob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
"...carbonated sucrose water. Or as they call it in the Midwest: pop."

In eastern Missouri, which would obviously be the "Midwest," we call it SODA, not pop.

The first time I heard "soda" referred to as "pop" was in New Jersey, in 1970.

11 posted on 04/12/2002 5:48:24 AM PDT by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bleudevil
I do believe you missed the satire implied in this column.

I was looking for the "Onion" or "BSNN" link.

Didn't see it and considered it legit.

It would not suprise me in least bit, if it was a real article.

True or fiction? It's getting hard to tell the difference nowadays

12 posted on 04/12/2002 6:19:59 AM PDT by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tahiti
Well, here in the south every soft drink is called a "coke"
13 posted on 04/12/2002 6:21:51 AM PDT by ToKillaMockingbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
Oh, good lord.

I gave up sody pop one year for lent. Haven't 'had' to have a coke, pepsi or whatever for years.

Now, french fries, on the other hand...

14 posted on 04/12/2002 6:29:02 AM PDT by Mr. Thorne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puff_List
HA HA HA.
We've been warning everyone that this would happen.
15 posted on 04/12/2002 6:32:46 AM PDT by Just another Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
Naw, as addictive as soda pop can be, it is nothing to cigs.
16 posted on 04/12/2002 6:34:13 AM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orual

No problem.

17 posted on 04/12/2002 6:37:19 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
Sugar is an addictive drug and should be regulated by the FDA.

Power is an additive "drug" that was intended to be regulated by the United States Constitution. That such notions as the one in this article (even if this article is intended to be "humor" as some have suggested, others are very serious about the same issue) can be advanced is solid evidence that the Constitution has been severely breached.

18 posted on 04/12/2002 7:09:13 AM PDT by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairWitness
additive = addictive
19 posted on 04/12/2002 7:12:15 AM PDT by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dighton
No problem.

Even if it were...

20 posted on 04/12/2002 7:39:01 AM PDT by Orual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson